Large water quality mass balance errors in systems that provide treatment at nodes were eliminated by correctly accounting for both the inflow mass and mass in storage when computing the mass lost to treatment. See treatmnt. Released: June 22, Engine Updates A new option was added to compute daily evaporation from the daily temperature values contained in a climate file using Hargreaves' method. See climate.
When the Ponding option is turned on, nodes that can pond are no longer always treated like storage nodes that never surcharge. Now they are only treated this way after ponding occurs. Otherwise they behave like a normal node.
The small tolerance used to decide when a storage node was full or not has been removed since for very small time steps it could cause a currently full storage unit to remain full even if there was some small net outflow from it.
See node. When the water level at a storage node exceeds the highest level supplied in its Storage Curve, an extrapolated surface area from the curve is now used only if the curve is sloping outward i. If instead it slopes inward then the last surface area entry in the curve is used.
See table. Space delimited NCDC rainfall files with empty spaces in the condition code fields can now be read correctly. A bug created in release 5. A new error check was added to detect if the time base of an RDII unit hydrograph is less than its rain gage recording interval.
Released: April 10, Engine Updates Storage unit nodes have a new optional property named Infiltration that can store Green-Ampt infiltration parameters for the unit and thus allow it to serve as an infiltration basin. The Green-Ampt infiltration model was modified to explicitly include the effect of ponded water depth on infiltration rate.
Different sets of Initial Abstraction parameters maximum depth, initial depth, and recovery rate can now be specified for each of the three unit hydrographs short term, medium term, and long term that comprise an RDII Unit Hydrograph group see keywords.
A Meander Modifier was added to a Transect's parameters. It is the ratio of the length of a meandering main channel to the length of the overbank area that surrounds it. This modifier is applied to all conduits that use this particular transect for their cross section. It assumes that the length supplied for these conduits is that of the longer main channel. SWMM will use the shorter overbank length in its calculations while internally increasing the main channel roughness to account for its longer length.
NWS files in space delimited TD or format that include a station name field have been added to the types of rainfall files that are automatically recognized by SWMM see rain. The 2 GB binary output file size limit for runs made under the GUI that was inadvertently added into release 5. Any backflow that flows into an outfall node due to the head condition at the node is now correctly reported as part of the node's Total Inflow result see node.
A fatal error is now generated if the smallest time interval between values in a rainfall time series does not match the recording time interval specified for the associated rain gage object instead of internally adjusting the gage interval and issuing a warning message see error. The normal flow limitation for dynamic wave flow routing based on the Froude number now requires that the latter be greater or equal to 1. An reporting error for the overflow rate into the ponded volume for a node that floods under dynamic wave flow routing was corrected see dynwave.
Released: January 21, Engine Updates Rain Gages gage. When two or more rain gages reference the same time series data, a fatal error message is now generated if the Rainfall Formats intensity, volume, or cumulative volume for the gages are not all the same. Infiltration infil. The saturated hydraulic conductivity is no longer needed by the Curve Number method to compute a regeneration rate for infiltration capacity. The latter is now set simply to the reciprocal of the user supplied drying time.
Thus the CN method now requires only two param- eters the CN and the drying time. An optional monthly adjustment pattern can now be used to modify the recovery rate of infiltration capacity by month of year.
The name of this pattern is specified as part of the Evaporation data. See the Help file or the Users Manual for details. This also affects files climate. Flow Routing flowrout. When this option is non- zero a computed conduit slope is not allowed to be below this value. The default is 0. Note: the slope of a conduit whose elevation difference is below 0.
The following files were also changed for this feature: keywords. An optional Baseline Time Pattern was added for external inflows at nodes. It can be used to apply a periodic adjustment to the baseline inflow value by month of year, day of week, etc. See the Help file or the Users Manual for more details. Specific conduits can now be designated as Culverts and have Inlet Control flow computed for them under Dynamic Wave flow routing.
The rating curve used to determine flow through an Outlet can now be based on either the freeboard depth above the outlet bottom as before or on the head difference between the upstream and downstream nodes. The calculation of the maximum outflow that a node can release over a time step should be based on the initial volume, not the final volume, at the node. A problem with the program not accepting an ideal pump when the connecting upstream conduit had an adverse slope was fixed.
A problem with the program crashing when the No Routing option was selected in combination with the Save Outflows Interface File option was fixed see output.
Under Steady Flow and Kinematic Wave routing one can now use a Dummy conduit that connects to a node at higher elevation without having to specify an inlet offset. Dynamic Wave Flow Routing dynwave. When ponding is allowed, ponded volume is now computed from the computed nodal depth rather than adjusting the depth to accommodate the ponded volume based on the excess of inflow versus outflow. This is a return to the original method that was used up until Release 5.
The volume at the inlet node of Type I pumps where an implicit wet well is assumed to occur is now determined on the basis of computed depth, just as with storage nodes, rather than computing depth from the change in volume.
The possible closing of tide gates on outfalls directly connected to orifice, weir, or outlet links is now correctly accounted for. Conduit Cross-Sections xsect. It thus becomes an upside down version of the Rectangular-Round shape. The section geometry functions for both shapes received extensive revision. Control Rules controls. The way that concentrations in runoff are combined with those from runon and direct rainfall was modified so as to produce more consistent results, especially when a BMP removal value is appled.
Water Quality Routing qualrout. An inflow rate adjustment was added when routing quality through conduits under Dynamic Wave flow routing to help lower the mass continuity error. The formula for updating the hydraulic residence time HRT in a storage node was revised. Quality routing under Steady Flow routing is now treated as a special case where the concentration within a conduit simply equals that of the upstream node.
Any reverse flow into the system that occurs at an Outfall node is now treated as an external inflow with respect to water quality and will therefore contain whatever pollutant concentration was specified for external inflows at the node even if no external flow inflow was defined. This feature can be used to model saltwater or contaminant intrusion in tidally influenced channels.
Groundwater gwater. The flow equation was re-expressed in terms of distances above the aquifer bottom instead of absolute elevations. The equation for computing the maximum infiltration rate that the upper zone can accept was corrected.
Snowmelt snow. The fraction of this amount that remains on the surface is whatever is left over after all of the redistribution options are satisfied. The "Depth at which removal begins" value is now correctly converted to internal units of feet. RDII rdii. Time Series table. See the Users Manual or the Help file for details. Status Report statsrpt. The widths for the various types of flow volume fields e. Binary Output File output. Output Report command line version report.
Released: March 11, Engine Updates The check on acceptable values for site latitude was corrected see climate. The definition and implementation of the PID controller was changed. See the Help file or the Users Manual for details see controls. The following changes were made to the dynamic wave flow routing routine in dynwave. A code re-factoring error that crept into the inertial term of the momentum equation was corrected.
The flow in a fully flowing open channel can no longer be greater than the full normal flow. The Normal Flow Limit based on both slope and Froude number was modified to simply implement the two criteria together in the same fashion as they are done individually. A check was added that prevents any flow out of a node that is dry.
The ponding computation was reverted back to that of 5. Using the maximum allowable change in depth at a node as a criterion for selecting a variable time step was restored. The crown elevations of any connecting non-conduit links are now considered when determining a node's crown elevation see flowrout. The possibility that the initial setting of an orifice was not being made correctly was eliminated see link. Error checks were added to test for invalid numbers in a hot start file see routing.
Released: February 04, Engine Updates The summary results tables written to the Status Report file have been updated and expanded. See the Users Manual for more details. Code changes to support this were made to dynwave. Conduit offsets can now be specified as an absolute elevation or, as before, a relative depth above the node invert. The same is true for the bottom of orifices, weirs, and outlets. A PID-type controller has been added to the types of modulated control rules that are available.
See the Help file or the Users Manual for instructions on how to use this feature see controls. In the simulation results, "flooding" is now considered to occur whenever the water level exceeds the top of a node, whether ponding occurs or not. Before, flooding was only recorded when there was no ponding and node overflow was lost from the system see dynwave. The point at which the time to drain the upper soil zone for Green-Ampt infiltration is first calculated was moved from time 0 to the time when the first rainfall period occurs.
This fixes a problem where different runoff hydrographs were being produced when a project's start date was shifted slightly see infil. The criteria used to determine when steady state flow conditions exist were changed to more closely follow those used in SWMM 4 see routing.
The optional user-assigned maximum flow limit for conduits was made operational for all flow routing options, not just Dynamic Wave routing see link. The possibility that ponding could occur at the inlet wet well node for a Type I pump was added see dynwave. A mistake in the Hazen-WIlliams head loss formula for force main conduits was corrected see forcmain.
The minimum limit of 0. The use of a maximum allowable change in depth at a node as a criterion for selecting a variable time step for dynamic wave flow routing was dropped see dynwave.
A more refined method for computing the flow across a bottom orifice at low heads was implemented. The head loss calculation caused by flap gates in weirs was extended to orifices as well see link. The computation of depth as a function of area for a trapezoidal channel was extended to consider the case where the user used 0 for the side slopes making it a rectangular channel - a holdover from SWMM 4 see xsect.
A bug introduced in 5. The "Snow Only" option for the buildup of a pollutant was never actually implemented and has now been added see subcatch. Additional error checking for valid snow melt and snow pack input parameters was added see snow. The same runoff threshold is now used for both pollutant washoff when above the threshold and buildup when below the threshold to avoid non-zero runoff concentrations from being reported during periods with negligible runoff see subcatch.
The values for total system outflow and system flooding that are saved to the binary results file at each reporting time step are now set equal to the same values that are used for computing the overall flow continuity error, thus avoiding inconsistent system outflow values being generated for some data sets see output. Released: July 16, Engine Updates A bug that prevented Weir and Outlet settings from being updated after they were changed by control rules was fixed see link.
The control setting for a Weir was not being accounted for when computing an equivalent orifice coefficient for surcharged flow or when computing flow through a V-notch weir see link. The reported depth of flow through a Weir was not taking into account the Weir's control setting see link.
An update made in 5. The equations used to mix the quality of runon, rainfall and ponded water over a subcatchment were revised to prevent numerical instability at very low volumes see subcatch.
Missing values in NCDC rainfall files that use the 'M' flag are now added to the total number of missing records reported see rain. Released: September 19, Engine Updates A climate file in the user-prepared format will no longer be confused with one using the Canadian format see climate. The minimum runoff which can generate pollutant washoff was changed from 0. A new RDII event now begins when the duration of a continuous run of dry weather exceeds the base time of the longest unit hydrograph rather than arbitrarily being set at 12 hours see rdii.
Problems with dynamic flow routing through long force mains connected to Type 3 and Type 4 pumps have been corrected see dynwave. Released: July 05, Engine Updates The conversion from the Horton infiltration drying time input parameter to an equivalent regeneration curve constant was corrected. Pipe invert elevations at outfalls are now measured relative to the outfall stage elevation rather than the outfall's invert elevation. A possible error in computing flow depth from head when checking the normal flow limitation based on the Froude number for dynamic wave flow routing was corrected.
A potential problem with converting the units of rainfall read from an external file was corrected. The equivalent length of orifices and weirs was changed from being a minimum of ft to a maximum of ft. The reporting of total system maximum runoff rate in the Status Report's Subcatchment Runoff Summary table has been corrected.
The subcatchment pollutant washoff process was reprogrammed to provide more rigorous mass balance results for the case where runoff from one subcatchment is routed over another subcatchment or when there is direct deposition from rainfall.
A constant value and a scaling factor have been added to Direct External inflows. A listing of total washoff loads for each pollutant for each subcatchment has been added to the Status Report. A new summary table of Outfall flows and pollutant loads has been added to the Status Report. The 5. Released: March 10, Engine Updates An "Ignore Rainfall" analysis option was added that causes the program to only consider user-supplied external inflow time series and dry weather flows and ignore any rainfall inputs that would otherwise produce runoff.
The hydraulic radius calculations for Rectangular-Closed, Rectangular-Triangular, and Rectangular-Round conduit shapes were modified to account for the increase in wetted perimeter that occurs under full flow due to the top surface. Refinements were made in several places in the code that need to distinguish between Full Flow and Maximum Flow conditions in closed conduits.
The code now properly accounts for the case where the depth at which the maximum normal flow occurs through an irregular shaped cross section is less than the full depth. The final volume of any ponded water caused by node flooding is now included in the reported flow continuity error.
Peak runoff flow was added to the Subcatchment Summary table in the Status Report. Released: November 10, Engine Updates Modifications were made to full depth entries of width tables for closed rounded cross-section shapes to improve the numerical stability for dynamic wave flow routing.
Error was added to detect if the size of the binary results file would exceed the 2. A units problem for RDII inflows under metric flow units was corrected.
Rule-based control of crest height for weirs was corrected previously the control setting adjusted flow rather than the relative distance between weir crest and crown. All projects must have been in the design or construction phase over the last 18 months. French Drains and Their Downfall. Cultec Chambers Added to Boss Intl. StormNET Software. Modeling software includes BMPs to support the design and analysis of water systems. Project Manager Sayre Associates, Inc.
Sioux Falls, SD www. BOSS International has reduced computation time between iterations in our stormwater design by providing one comprehensive program with options that allow us to evaluate the performance of the entire stormwater network with one mouse click. We previously used three programs to design and evaluate culverts, channels, and basin outlets. The interaction with CAD files adds a degree of realism to our projects by allowing our engineers to insert a background and then digitize areas and lengths at our stations instead of relying on the drafting department for information.
It is also comforting to know that knowledgeable, free technical support is available to assist us in getting the most out of the StormNET software. StormNET software meets my design and analysis needs very well I wanted to touch base with you regarding our recent acquisition of StormNET.
You may recall I was very frank with you prior to purchasing the software that I was evaluating competitive products, and BOSS International would have to "win" my business! Several factors were considered in my decision, including the company behind the software. In the end, it was the support of the BOSS staff, their earnest desire to address my questions and concerns, which made the decision easy. StormNET software meets my design and analysis needs very well, was more competitively priced, and offered lifetime support for the initial investment price.
This reflects what I feel is a strong attitude of "customer care" from BOSS International - an attitude that has been consistent over time. Please share my sincere "Thanks" with the BOSS team, and rest assured that in this time of faceless, on-line interaction genuine customer service still makes a difference!
Curtis Y. Neufeld, P. Sitelines P. Brunswick, ME www. It is very user friendly, accurate and has since saved me hours of work. When I began working with the demo version, I was instantly hooked. It does the things that I used to wish other programs did.
The unlimited technical support, along with the videos and user manual, has been great. I would recommend this program to anyone who wishes to save time on their civil designs. Justin Brammer, E.
Fort Worth, TX www. StormNET is one of the most powerful hydraulic models out there. These tools have been an awesome addition to our modeling capabilities in the company and we plan on using StormNET for all similar projects in the future. The value of the software has increased with the capability to display the modeling results in a GIS environment.
It has been a pleasure working with you and your team and we will not hesitate to give you our input in the future. Mankato, MN www. StormNET replaces the old way of using spreadsheets and calculators.
The use of StormNET has significantly reduced the time in creating site drainage reports while at the same time providing detailed information instrumental in the design of our projects. Their technical support has been excellent. I would recommend to anyone looking into software for stormwater designs and calculations to try out the full trial version of the software offered by BOSS International.
Seeing is believing!!!! The biggest difficulty in today's computerized engineering world is "garbage-in garbage-out". With an ever increasing capability and complexity of engineering software it is easy to loose focus on what is really happening within your analyses. Too easy to enter data, push a couple buttons and accept the output.
StormNET is an interactive real-time stormwater and combined system modeling software that gives you the ability to observe systems in full operational mode! I have found it not only to be an easy setup, but the real-time editing allows for visual verification and quick changes.
StormNET is a very powerful program, but it doesn't tax your operating system! I am also extremely pleased with the BOSS technical support. Their response time is prompt and they work diligently with you until the problem is solved. In some cases, they will even request a copy of your analysis and evaluate it "in-house" to resolve the problem.
The BOSS commitment to costumer satisfaction and software development is relentless. Steven M. Barbur, P. Project Manager Bryant Associates, P. Syracuse, NY www. Using StormNET has greatly reduced my time required to complete stormwater design The StormNET program is a very complete and effective software package. StormNET contains an interface that is very easy to navigate and provides the user with a vast amount of capabilities regarding the modeling of watersheds, pipe and inlet systems, detention ponds with complex outlet structures, water quality design, and more.
Using StormNET has greatly reduced my time required to complete stormwater design for detailed site development projects primarily because I previously needed several separate programs to accomplish the same task.
Now I can explore all aspects of my storm water design within the same program and utilize the animation features to see how my system will function in real time. I am very satisfied with the StormNET program, and think that it offers unparalleled design capabilities at an affordable price when compared to other programs of its kind.
Tony Bernardi, E. Scranton, PA www. StormNET is one of the best stormwater modeling programs available. It's rare to find a product that can model very complex systems while remaining very user-friendly. The graphic and animation features are particularly useful when presenting to clients.
Boston, MA www. The program paid immediate dividends and will dramatically improve our efficiency. As a new user to StormNET, we were up and running with it on our first project in a very short time and had a very small learning curve. Tech support is always available and they not only understand the program, but stormwater system design.
It's an excellent investment. Emmett Mancinelli, P. I really appreciate the StormNET software of amazing ability.
It enables me to analyze various situations such as culverts, retention ponds and open channel. No effort is required to combine all different practices in one place. Unfortunately I have not fully utilized the software of huge potential yet. I hope it would give me more confidence and freedom in wider extent of engineering practices. Tauranga New Zealand. The node and link based system allows for quick and easy creation of natural and man-made open channel stormwater conveyance system.
The graphical result features allows for quick evaluation of results and the program allows for easy refinement of the systems. In addition, the software had very few operating issues and what issues there were the technical support helped me resolve.
Chad Tomlinson, P. It's inclusive programming saves design time StormNET is one of the more cutting edge storm event programs available right now. It's inclusive programming saves design time with the ability to import images and computer drawings and the inclusion of a pipe system design.
The aerial imaging is an especially powerful tool to get your design judgments across to reviewers. Additionally, the product support team at BOSS International is a huge asset showing both a prompt response time and vast knowledge of the program. Aaron B. Pesek, P. Austin, TX www. StormNET has expedited our engineering time by consolidating hydraulics and hydrology calculations StormNET has expedited our engineering time by consolidating hydraulics and hydrology calculations into one program.
Before the introduction of StormNET into our company, we performed separate analysis for the hydrology aspects of the project and coupled the raw data into a hydraulics calculator for design.
StormNET reduces design iteration time and increases productivity. StormNET gives us a strong engineering tool. It's easy to work with, it's fast, and it gives impressive output. The StormNET software is the best and most user-friendly for storm sewer The StormNET software is the best and most user-friendly for storm sewer, detention basin, and sanitary sewer design. It is very useful for optimizing our designs. Mark Mahajan, P.
I was able to have it as an engineering tool in our software library. StormNET is one of the easiest and most powerful drainage analysis software I have ever used. And moreover the customer service with StormNET is easily one of the best in the industry.
I am glad that I was able to have it as an engineering tool in our software library. Freddy Irianto, P. Riverside, CA www. Our efficiency for analyzing storm drain systems on our site developments has improved using the StormNET software due to its graphical interface that can be easily manipulated to model different routings, pipe sizes, structures, and storm events. Jesse Miller, P. Blacksburg, VA www. StormNET is a valuable tool for analyzing large complex watersheds.
These include the modeling of inlets, importing of AutoCAD information for watershed area take off, and fast report creation in Microsoft Excel formats. I was also impressed with its ability to convert older SWMM file formats. Lastly, what little technical support that I have needed was excellent. Robert Steele, P. McLean Associates, P. Brookhaven, NY www. I purchased StormNET to model a system that used several horizontal elliptical pipes, and specialty low head box culverts, concrete trickle channels, and dirt ditches, all non-typical sections.
It went from a very long and tedious calculation to a rather simple run. Bret H. StormNET's horizontal plan view capabilities make it easy to build large networks StormNET's horizontal plan view capabilities make it easy to build large networks and keep track of where you are on site. The warning messages in the output report will generally catch a mistake if your inputs are in error.
The best feature, I believe, is the variety of graphical output the user can inspect. The number of variables you can plot over time is the largest I've done and allows for a greater understanding of how to increase efficiencies in the stormwater system. Indianapolis, IN www. The StormNET software is extremely powerful and has the ability to model almost any system Engineering, Inc. We have been able to accurately model the city's combined sewer system which has allowed us to analyze several different rain events.
The StormNET software is extremely powerful and has the ability to model almost any system that an engineer could encounter. Brian Giltner, P. Metropolis, IL. Using StormNET for land development work has been very beneficial Using StormNET for land development work has been very beneficial, giving us the ability to run many different rainfall scenarios quickly and efficiently. The wide selection of runoff and infiltration methods contained within the package gives us the ability to select a simulation which accurately reflects runoff from the wide variety of landforms we regularly deal with.
Ross Jennings B. I am quite impressed with your software I am quite impressed with your software and I have not come across anything like it on stormwater modelling that can make my life so easy and simply to get from point A to point B. All of our designers have found the software interface very user-friendly We have used StormNET on several projects, both large and small, domestic and international, for a wide variety of projects. One key attraction of StormNET was its capability of performing both storm sewer design and detention system routing.
Other software elements, such as the sanitary sewer modelling and water quality analysis add to its vast capabilities. All of our designers have found the software interface very user-friendly, and the graphics well presentable. Vincent Lee, P. StormNET has provided us with the following benefits: - Very good graphic and animation features that have been very useful in presentations to our clients. Mario S. Jalata, Jr. Louisville, KY www. StormNET's graphical interface has made defining and changing stormwater projects quick and easy.
Setup and changes are fast and provide detailed results reducing the overall project time. Nolan J. Albany, OR www. While we have just scratched the surface of what the StormNET program can do, we are very pleased with the program's capabilities and ease of operation. Jay C. Koch, P. We have experienced increased productivity as a result of implementing StormNET.
The easy to use graphical interface allows for quick analysis of various storm events, and provides methods for exporting the data into spreadsheets for comparing multiple scenarios and to GIS to overlay the proposed system over various maps. We opted to employ StormNET as a better method of modeling ponds and urban systems. Brian Burkhart, P. I really like the Manning's Coefficients lookup table and the rainfall database I really like the Manning's Coefficients lookup table and the rainfall database for the different storm events per county that is available in StormNET.
Rebecca E. Brentwood, TN www. It will save a lot of time for us in the stormwater management design. Thank you for the new version of StormNET, the software and online video are very nice. StormNET has allowed us to compile a useful, concise report in a much shorter time frame I just wanted to take a moment to drop you a quick note to let you know how pleased we are with the latest StormNET Version.
In we were able to increase our productivity with StormNET by reducing the amount of time it took us to model large and small drainage projects. In the past we have found that one of most time consuming tasks is correlating the results of the analysis; the calculations, exhibits, and storm drain profiles.
StormNET has allowed us to compile a useful, concise report in a much shorter time frame than we were accustomed. I also want to extend my gratitude to your sales and technical staff; someone is always available to answer my questions or help with a technical issue.
Loren R. The software is user friendly and it's customer support is more than expected. Our company does mostly geotechnical and environmental work; however, the experience with StormNET was rewarding for us. Shameem A. Phoenix, AZ www. I really appreciate your prompt technical support. We have been using StormNET for about a year and found that this is a user friendly program, increased our productivity, and more efficient.
In addition, I really appreciate your prompt technical support. Gehad Ramadan, P. Design Engineer R. Burnaby, BC, Canada www. StormNET is a comprehensive storm modeling program I appreciate BOSS International's continued customer service and readily available technical support.
StormNET is a comprehensive storm modeling program that assists in the design of storm pipes and structures as well as detention ponds and outlets. It produces tabulated and graphical results that can easily be used in the preparation of stormwater reports. Jennifer Dailey, E. Columbia, MO www. I have not yet been able to work extensively with StormNET, so this testimonial should most likely not be taken as an in depth summary of the effectiveness of this program.
However, in my initial use of the program, I have found that the visualization of storm drainage system behavior has been most helpful in adequately designing these systems.
I have also used the program to provide verification that a newly installed system will function properly based on constructed conditions. It is a great help to provide local review authorities visual output as well as detailed tabular information so that their review can be conducted more quickly.
I still have much, much more to learn about StormNET and its many capabilities, but my experience thus far has been one of pleasant surprise. Samuel J. Powers, E. Lumberton, NC. The StormNET software has helped me analyze complicated systems The StormNET software has helped me analyze complicated systems that were previously very time consuming. The icon and property dialogue display for each elements makes it very user friendly. Tech support was very accessible and informative. Noey Tran, P. John Pekar, P.
We have been using StormNET for about a year now, the program was easy to learn and we use it for both simple and complex models. I find that it is particularly efficient to update the model and to reflect the changes in the design. The unlimited technical support is a definite plus, the staff at BOSS is always helpful and friendly. Nanaimo, BC, Canada www. StormNET is a great hydraulic modeling software. It far surpasses other modeling software I've used and would highly recommend it to anyone looking to replace their current software.
Almost 2 years ago we evaluated other programs with similar abilities to replace the software we were currently using and determined StormNET to be the best, most complete package. I've performed both simple and complex models and StormNET has done a great job every time. Their tech support is very good at resolving issues I may have in my model or I've discovered in the program.
The issues I have found with the program they've been very prompt in generating a fix and sending out an update. They are constantly updating and improving their product. The tech support really sells the product. Keep up the great work!
Josh Bouchard, P. CMA Engineers, Inc. Manchester, NH www. StormNET software streamlines our design process. StormNET's self explanatory user interface has made it easy to learn and use during our brief time with the software.
We recommend StormNET to anyone dealing with hydrologic models or hydraulic designs. George, UT www. StormNET's strong point is it's ability to perform pavement drainage design.
0コメント